But this cant be fully true. There is a possibility that the great leadership qualities which history has witnessed in Martin Luther King., mk gandhi, nelson Mandela, abraham Lincoln, Steve jobs and much more, may be inherited or genetic but they wouldnt have been able to exhibit those traits. Leaders are born and not made is a myth. Leadership qualities are to be learned over time, when you put in a lot of hard work, when life knocks you down and you get up stronger, after going through grueling experiences, a leader is made. Everybody has a leader in him/her. Not every leader is good or a hero. Adolf Hitler killed a lot of people but he was a great leader in his field. Leaders are made just like anything else, through hard work.
Are leaders born or made essay, writing a good essay
patience is incredibly important; tinkering during the process is critical for getting a great outcome. companies must develop the ability to understand how to pair the result of intentional leadership development with the expert understanding of the context of the leadership challenge; sommeliers understand a wine must neither overpower nor be overpowered by the meal. It has been said diamonds are forever, but we know leaders are not, no matter what size their retention bonus. That is just one final way to show how the diamond metaphor breaks down. Feel free to reminisce about a depleted favorite vintage, but do what it takes to be sure the next one will present revise its own version of greatness. make the patient investments necessary to stock your leadership cellar. Some people are born to be leaders, others believe that leadership can be learnt. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Sample, essay, resume scientists have identified a genotype, rs4950, which they say is responsible for passing down the leadership qualities through generations. What would you conclude from this? Those leaders are born, not made.
Although a better metaphor can guide us in ways that improve leadership development and selection, it doesnt guarantee there wont be bad leaders. Some, in spite of great care taken, will turn out to be spoiled, just as the occasional bottle of wine is corked. However, the parallels between life winemaking and leadership development are not difficult to see. Considering leadership this way leads to different ways of developing and managing leadership talent. For example, trim very few individuals from those eligible for development; prune just enough to strengthen the focus on and the resolve of those who remain. Understand and engineer the terroir in which each individuals career grows; events that test the leader produce great depth and character. Spending to create experiences for many is a wiser investment than dumping money into a retention package for one.
But the leader's being ready is not yet the end of the effort. The next step, pairing, is just as critical. Pairing requires a deep understanding of the characteristics of both the wine and the meal; so too does leadership selection. Current practice involves a great deal of emphasis on studying the leader, and not enough attention is paid to diagnosing the situation. Just as gems are rated with precision on factors unseen by an unaided eye, such as cut, color, and clarity, leadership candidates are subjected to a barrage of assessments designed to quantify the differences between them in ways that support selection decisions. The operating assumption seems to be that the highest score will yield the best results. That doesnt work for wine, and it doesnt work for leaders. Oenophiles know that though a high score reflects something about the quality of a wine, it remains one persons opinion. Further, there are many instances where an admittedly modest wine is perfect for the occasion.
Good leaders are made not born essay
And while vines are pruned to focus energy on the papers production of a smaller, more intense crop, the amount of fruit that is eliminated is generally a small fraction of the total. The book final critical decision about the fruit is the timing of the harvest. For example, more time on the vine produces more sugar in the grape. More sugar isnt always whats desired. After the grapes have been harvested and pressed, the winemakers efforts continue.
How much alcohol should the wine carry? What storage does the wine need to reach its potential? How long will it take until it is ready? A plan evolves, and the barrel is regularly sampled so that adjustments can be made along the way to help shape the final result. And when the wine matures to that desired result, it is ready for the bottle. The description above conveys the sorts of considerations, efforts, and decisions it takes to ready a leader.
The metaphor should recognize leadership ability is not so rare. Leaders can be found in many places. They need not be expensive to develop. And we are fooling ourselves if we think that there are objective measures that can predict leader quality. The better metaphor comes from understanding the way a bottle of wine makes it to your table.
Shutterstock, developing leaders is like making wine. First, the raw material, the grapes, matters. Sauvignon Blanc grapes produce a different wine from Cabernet sauvignon grapes, and it is impossible to make one take on characteristics of the other. So, too, does the raw material of leaders have an unmistakable effect on the final result. However, just as with wine, the final product in leadership is a function of both the grape and the way it has been treated. Given the grape, the next factor winemakers consider is the terroir, the environmental characteristics that influenced the fruits growth. Winemakers view this nuanced challenge as part art and part science. Soil, sun, temperatures, and moisture all play a role in shaping the potential of the grape. Interestingly, stress to the vine is critical in creating robust fruit.
Essay on leaders, discos Corasón
While we can inculcate some features in ourselves, some things are definitely inborn. This article is summary by nathan Bennett, the associate dean for faculty and research at the. Mack robinson College of Business at georgia state University. We have an expensive misunderstanding when it comes to developing leaders. The easiest way to describe our error is with a metaphor. Our approach to developing leadership too closely mimics the way rare gems, like diamonds, get to market. Diamonds are precious because they are in finite supply, can be found only in certain places, are difficult and expensive to mine, and after processing can be graded using objective measures of quality. That process serves as an apt description of how companies search for a leader, but it is a flawed approach. We can improve leadership by adopting a better metaphor for understanding leadership development.
Integrity; the ability to stand their ground no matter how great the odds, or the threats, these are qualities that are inborn, and cannot be cultivated. Gandhijis faith in peaceful resistance did not waver in the face of grave danger. Myanmars Aung San suu kyi was placed in house arrest for several years. She was denied the right of meeting her dying husband. Yet, she refused to back down, and stood for her principles. These examples are known for their enormous strength of mind and character. Conclusion, so, to conclude, we can indeed say that leaders are born, and cannot be made.
the homes of the economically and socially backward communities. Spiritual leaders like the dalai lama, mata Amritanandamayi, and the late pope john paul ii have the ability to influence millions, despite their gentle and peaceful demeanor. On the other hand, political leaders like hitler, subash Chandra bose, or Gaddaffi are known for their fiery and passionate speeches. Some features like confidence, communication skills, grooming skills, and a well-defined personality can be developed. Nobody is born brilliant. Our personalities are formed as the result of the influence of several factors, such as our education, the company we keep, the books we read etc. However, there are some things that cannot be cultivated. Not everybody can be a great leader, who has the charisma and might to influence people.
Our leaders can be an influence in any sphere of from our life. It can be anyone from our boss at work, to a teacher, to a political leader. Can leadership qualities be cultivated? Firstly, what are the qualities of a good leader? Confidence in their words and actions, integrity and honesty, clear communication skills, Pride is an important aspect of an individuals personality, but arrogance is a negative trait, which should be avoided. If a person wants to be regarded as a leader, she or he should never be too busy or big to interact with anybody who approaches them. Politicians know this very well, which is why when they campaign, they spend time walking and talking to people from a wide cross-section of society.
Essay on Nelson Mandela cram
Leaders are made, not Born: Behavioral Theories on leadership kibin. It looks like you've lost connection to our server. Please check your internet connection or reload this page. Scroll to top, view other essays like this one: Company, follow. Introduction, everybody looks up to a person they can trust, and who can guide them. We all loyalty are inspired by someone who can hold their own confidently, is sure of what they are saying and doing, and walks the talk. These are people whom we idolize; these are the people who we call leaders.